State v. Summers

477 S.W.2d 721, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 647
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 23, 1972
Docket34236
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 477 S.W.2d 721 (State v. Summers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Summers, 477 S.W.2d 721, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 647 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

DOWD, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction following a jury waived trial. The defendant was found guilty of the failure to support “his child” who was under the age of 16 years. 1

After defendant rested his case, the court stated: “I’m going to find him guilty and sentence him to six months in the City Workhouse and I’ll grant him probation.” Defendant immediately filed a “Motion for a New Trial or for Outright Reversal and Acquittal,” which was overruled. Thereafter, defendant filed his notice of appeal to this court.

There is no showing here that the defendant was ever sentenced or that a final judgment of conviction was entered after the motion for a new trial was overruled. On the contrary, the record here shows that the court attempted to sentence the defendant before the filing and ruling on defendant’s motion for a new trial. This attempt sentencing was premature and void as being made prior to the filing and ruling on the motion for a new trial. State v. Jaeger, Mo., 394 S.W.2d 347 [10-14] ; State v. Grimes, Mo.App., 470 S.W.2d 4; State v. Ezell, Mo.App., 470 S.W.2d 162; Criminal Rule 27.20, V.A.M.R.

We have no jurisdiction to hear this appeal in the absence of a final judgment in the trial court. There is nothing from which an appeal can be taken. State v. Chase, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 731 [1-3].

The submission of this cause on appeal must be set aside and the case remanded to the trial court with directions to properly sentence the defendant and render a final judgment. The defendant will then have the right to appeal from that judgment. State v. Chase, supra.

BRADY, C. J., and SMITH and WEIER, JJ., concur.
1

. Section 559.353, RSMo., V.A.M.S. — a misdemeanor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jacobs
421 S.W.3d 507 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)
State v. DeGraffenreid
855 S.W.2d 450 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)
State v. Ramos
751 S.W.2d 135 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1988)
State v. Wren
609 S.W.2d 480 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
State v. Gonterman
588 S.W.2d 754 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
State v. Collins
580 S.W.2d 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
City of Kansas City v. Rowell
548 S.W.2d 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
City of St. Louis v. Matthews
509 S.W.2d 194 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1974)
City of St. Louis v. Richardson
509 S.W.2d 195 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1974)
City of Riverside v. Johnson
507 S.W.2d 48 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1974)
City of Kansas City v. Scanland
506 S.W.2d 18 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1974)
State v. Spear
503 S.W.2d 52 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 S.W.2d 721, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-summers-moctapp-1972.