State v. Sultaana

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Sultaana

5 N.E.3d 664, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1445

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 2014

Docket2014-0404

StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.E.3d 664 (State v. Sultaana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sultaana, 5 N.E.3d 664, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1445 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 100781. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due March 21, 2014, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 100781. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due March 21, 2014, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 N.E.3d 664, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sultaana-ohio-2014.