State v. Sullivan
620 P.2d 966, 49 Or. App. 730, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 4055
This text of 620 P.2d 966 (State v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Sullivan, 620 P.2d 966, 49 Or. App. 730, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 4055 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction after a jury verdict of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant has failed to set out his claim of error in compliance with Rule 7.19, Oregon Rules of Appellate Procedure. We decline to review the asserted error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
620 P.2d 966, 49 Or. App. 730, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 4055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sullivan-orctapp-1980.