State v. Sullivan

2019 Ohio 4413
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2019·No. 2019-L-004 & 2019-L-005·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellee, :

CASE NOS. 2019-L-004

- vs - : 2019-L-005

KEVIN F. SULLIVAN, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeals from the Willoughby Municipal Court, Case Nos. 2018 CRB 00355 B and 2018 CRB 01014.

Judgment: Appeals dismissed.

Judson J. Hawkins, City of Eastlake Prosecutor, 37811 Lake Shore Boulevard, Eastlake, Ohio 44095 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Cory R. Hinton, Hanahan & Hinton, LLC, 8570 Mentor Avenue, Mentor, Ohio 44060 (For Defendant-Appellant).

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.

{¶1} Appellant was charged with domestic violence, R.C. 2919.25(A), and assault, R.C. 2903.13(A), in case number 18 CBR 00366. He was charged with violating a protection order, R.C. 2919.27(A)(1), in case number 18 CRB 01014.

{¶2} The cases were consolidated for trial only. The jury found appellant guilty of assault and violating a protection order but not guilty of domestic violence. On August 24, 2018, separate judgments were issued finding appellant guilty of assault and violating

a protection order. On September 18, 2018, separate sentencing judgments were issued. The sentencing judgments do not restate the fact of conviction. Appellant separately appealed the sentencing judgments which were consolidated for appeal.

{¶3} “A judgment of conviction shall set forth the fact of conviction and the sentence.” Crim.R. 32(C). A final appealable order does not exist unless the fact of conviction and the sentence are stated in a single judgment. State v. Lusane, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2019-P-00027, 2019-Ohio-3549, ¶ 5, citing State v. Lester, 130 Ohio St.3d 303; 2011-Ohio-5204, 958 N.E.2d 142, at paragraph one of the syllabus; State v. Rexrode, 2017-Ohio-8837, 100 N.E.3d 1089, ¶ 12 (10th Dist.).

{¶4} Because the sentencing judgments do not restate the fact of conviction, the appeals are dismissed for lack of final appealable orders.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sullivan, 2019 Ohio 4413 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).

2019 Ohio 4413 (State v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wilson
2025 Ohio 1696 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
State v. Beckett
2021 Ohio 1687 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Martin
2021 Ohio 1632 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State v. Sullivan
2020 Ohio 1439 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)