State v. Sullivan
This text of 217 A.2d 452 (State v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
Counsel assigned to prosecute a post-conviction proceeding under R. R. 3:10A on behalf of a defendant convicted of murder appeals from an allowance of $350 for his services. The county does not cross-appeal but notes the issue presented in State v. Loray and State v. Smith, 46 N. J. 417 (1966), both decided by us today, as to whether compensation may be awarded in a proceeding of this kind-In the present case, the trial court correctly held, as did the trial courts in Loray and Smith, that N. J. S. 2A:163-1 authorizes an award against the county. We think, however, the allowance was too low and should be raised to $1,000. The judgment is modified accordingly.
For modification — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettiwo — 6.
Opposed — ETone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.2d 452, 46 N.J. 420, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sullivan-nj-1966.