State v. Sullivan

565 So. 2d 922, 1990 La. LEXIS 2040, 1990 WL 127825
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Sullivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 177
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 4, 1990·No. No. 90-KD-1951·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The district court is ordered to permit Steve Ehrsam, Lera Trekell, Theresa Ehrsam, and Michelle Melle to testify. The testimony may be relevant for defendant to show how he would have used the undisclosed evidence in order to show that the result of the trial would have been different. United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985).

COLE, J., concurs, the majority is not ruling on the admissibility of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sullivan, 565 So. 2d 922, 1990 La. LEXIS 2040, 1990 WL 127825 (La. 1990).

565 So. 2d 922 (State v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bagley
473 U.S. 667 (Supreme Court, 1985)