State v. Sullivan

Connecticut Superior Court

State v. Sullivan

453 A.2d 93, 38 Conn. Super. Ct. 537, 38 Conn. Supp. 537, 1982 Conn. Super. LEXIS 242

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1982

DocketFILE No. 1069

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 453 A.2d 93 (State v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sullivan, 453 A.2d 93, 38 Conn. Super. Ct. 537, 38 Conn. Supp. 537, 1982 Conn. Super. LEXIS 242 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

The state instituted this petition for a judgment of support against the defendant as the putative father of a minor child who had received state assistance under the aid to families with dependent children program. Following the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff in this action, the defendant instituted a separate action under General Statutes 52-270, seeking a new trial on the issue of paternity. In the latter action, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant granting him a new trial. The state appealed from that judgment in Sullivan v. State, 38 Conn. Sup. 534, 453 A.2d 91 (1982).

The parties to the present action have stipulated that a finding of no error in the companion matter renders moot the present appeal. Such a finding having been rendered in that matter, this appeal is herewith ordered dismissed.

DALY, BIELUCH and COVELLO, Js., participated in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The state instituted this petition for a judgment of support against the defendant as the putative father of a minor child who had received state assistance under the aid to families with dependent children program. Following the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff in this action, the defendant instituted a separate action under General Statutes 52-270, seeking a new trial on the issue of paternity. In the latter action, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant granting him a new trial. The state appealed from that judgment in Sullivan v. State, 38 Conn. Sup. 534, 453 A.2d 91 (1982).

The parties to the present action have stipulated that a finding of no error in the companion matter renders moot the present appeal. Such a finding having been rendered in that matter, this appeal is herewith ordered dismissed.

DALY, BIELUCH and COVELLO, Js., participated in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 A.2d 93, 38 Conn. Super. Ct. 537, 38 Conn. Supp. 537, 1982 Conn. Super. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sullivan-connsuperct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack