State v. Sullentrup

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sullentrup

803 S.W.2d 631, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 76

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1991·No. Nos. 58129, 58130, 58131 and 58132·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for driving while intoxicated, failure to display lighted lamps, failure to drive on right half of roadway, and escape from custody.

[632]*632No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for driving while intoxicated, failure to display lighted lamps, failure to drive on right half of roadway, and escape from custody.

[632]*632No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sullentrup, 803 S.W.2d 631, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

803 S.W.2d 631 (State v. Sullentrup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.