State v. Suarez
678 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8890, 1996 WL 471018
Opinion
The State petitions for a writ of certiorari quashing the trial court’s order compelling the victim and prosecution witnesses to appear and participate at a live lineup containing the defendant. Because the defense has failed to establish a strong or compelling reason to warrant this exceptional remedy, [882] we grant the petition and quash the trial court’s order. See State v. Kuntsman, 643 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Ray, 604 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 613 So.2d 8 (Fla.1992).
Certiorari granted; order quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Suarez, 678 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8890, 1996 WL 471018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
678 So. 2d 881 (State v. Suarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ray
604 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Kuntsman
643 So. 2d 1172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)