Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Suarez

State v. Suarez

678 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8890, 1996 WL 471018
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 1996
DocketNo. 96-1717
StatusPublished

This text of 678 So. 2d 881 (State v. Suarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Suarez, 678 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8890, 1996 WL 471018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State petitions for a writ of certiorari quashing the trial court’s order compelling the victim and prosecution witnesses to appear and participate at a live lineup containing the defendant. Because the defense has failed to establish a strong or compelling reason to warrant this exceptional remedy, [882]*882we grant the petition and quash the trial court’s order. See State v. Kuntsman, 643 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Ray, 604 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 613 So.2d 8 (Fla.1992).

Certiorari granted; order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ray
604 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Kuntsman
643 So. 2d 1172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 So. 2d 881, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8890, 1996 WL 471018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-suarez-fladistctapp-1996.