State v. Styron

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Styron

150 P.3d 1071, 210 Or. App. 458, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 9

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 3, 2007

Docket05040771; A129709

StatusPublished

This text of 150 P.3d 1071 (State v. Styron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Styron, 150 P.3d 1071, 210 Or. App. 458, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 9 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a supplemental judgment imposing restitution relating to his conviction for burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215. The award of restitution included $500 for “down time of business.” ORS 137.106. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish that the victim suffered any pecuniary damages for “down time of business” as a result of defendant’s criminal activities. We agree and accept the concession.

Supplemental judgment vacated; remanded for recalculation of restitution; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a supplemental judgment imposing restitution relating to his conviction for burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215. The award of restitution included $500 for “down time of business.” ORS 137.106. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish that the victim suffered any pecuniary damages for “down time of business” as a result of defendant’s criminal activities. We agree and accept the concession.

Supplemental judgment vacated; remanded for recalculation of restitution; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 P.3d 1071, 210 Or. App. 458, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-styron-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack