State v. Stypa
This text of 548 A.2d 812 (State v. Stypa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
David Stypa appeals his convictions in the Superior Court (York County; Bro-drick, J.) of aggravated assault, assault on a child under six years of age, and endangering the welfare of a child under 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 208(1)(A), 207, and 554 (1983 & Supp.1987), respectively. We affirm. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying continuances. State v. Reed, 479 A.2d 1291, 1295 (Me.1984); State v. Curtis, 295 A.2d 252, 255 (Me.1972). We find no merit in the other issues, many of which were not even raised in the trial court.
The entry is:
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 A.2d 812, 1988 Me. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stypa-me-1988.