State v. Sturgill

106 P.3d 646, 196 Or. App. 638, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1631
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 15, 2004
Docket20-03-02046; A121228
StatusPublished

This text of 106 P.3d 646 (State v. Sturgill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sturgill, 106 P.3d 646, 196 Or. App. 638, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1631 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing. State v. Gornick, 196 Or App 397, 102 P3d 734 (2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gornick
102 P.3d 734 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 P.3d 646, 196 Or. App. 638, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sturgill-orctapp-2004.