State v. Sturgill

840 P.2d 112, 116 Or. App. 390, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2047
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 12, 1992
Docket90-21134; CA A71575
StatusPublished

This text of 840 P.2d 112 (State v. Sturgill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sturgill, 840 P.2d 112, 116 Or. App. 390, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2047 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Jail confinement as a condition of probation vacated; otherwise affirmed. State v. Brown, 115 Or App 327, 838 P2d 624 (1992); State v. Harding, 116 Or App 29, 840 P2d 113 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. L. BROWN
838 P.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Harding
840 P.2d 113 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
840 P.2d 112, 116 Or. App. 390, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sturgill-orctapp-1992.