State v. Stucky
2 Blackf. 289, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 42
Opinion
AN indictment, for retailing spirituous liquors to divers persons without licence, is bad. It should either contain the names of the persons to whom the sale was made, or state their names to be unknown. 1 Chitt. C. L. 211.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Stucky, 2 Blackf. 289, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 42 (Ind. 1829).
2 Blackf. 289 (State v. Stucky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walters v. State
92 N.E. 537 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
State v. Hogreiver
53 N.E. 921 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)
Beebe v. State
6 Ind. 501 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1855)
State v. Irvin
5 Blackf. 343 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)
Butler v. State
5 Blackf. 280 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)