State v. Stucky
2 Blackf. 289, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 42
This text of 2 Blackf. 289 (State v. Stucky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Stucky, 2 Blackf. 289, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 42 (Ind. 1829).
Opinion
AN indictment, for retailing spirituous liquors to divers persons without licence, is bad. It should either contain the names of the persons to whom the sale was made, or state their names to be unknown. 1 Chitt. C. L. 211.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walters v. State
92 N.E. 537 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
State v. Hogreiver
53 N.E. 921 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)
Beebe v. State
6 Ind. 501 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1855)
State v. Irvin
5 Blackf. 343 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)
Butler v. State
5 Blackf. 280 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1840)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Blackf. 289, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stucky-ind-1829.