State v. Stubbs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Stubbs

139 P.3d 973, 207 Or. App. 43, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1030

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 19, 2006

Docket0400073M; A125360

StatusPublished

This text of 139 P.3d 973 (State v. Stubbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stubbs, 139 P.3d 973, 207 Or. App. 43, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1030 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for endangering the welfare of a minor. ORS 163.575. He assigns error to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence that he contends was obtained by exploitation of an unlawful traffic stop. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for endangering the welfare of a minor. ORS 163.575. He assigns error to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence that he contends was obtained by exploitation of an unlawful traffic stop. The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), the trial court erred. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 P.3d 973, 207 Or. App. 43, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stubbs-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack