State v. Stuart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Stuart

989 P.2d 480, 164 Or. App. 169, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1948

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 10, 1999

Docket96-587; CA A100410

StatusPublished

This text of 989 P.2d 480 (State v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stuart, 989 P.2d 480, 164 Or. App. 169, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1948 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175(1)(c). All of defendant’s assignment of errors, except one, were decided in a companion case. See State v. Cook, 163 Or App 578, 989 P2d 474 (1999). Defendant’s remaining assignment of error does not merit discussion.

Judgment of conviction vacated; remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for lesser-included offense of third-degree assault.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175(1)(c). All of defendant’s assignment of errors, except one, were decided in a companion case. See State v. Cook, 163 Or App 578, 989 P2d 474 (1999). Defendant’s remaining assignment of error does not merit discussion.

Judgment of conviction vacated; remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for lesser-included offense of third-degree assault.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

989 P.2d 480, 164 Or. App. 169, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stuart-orctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack