State v. Stuart

989 P.2d 480, 164 Or. App. 169, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1948
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 10, 1999·No. 96-587; CA A100410·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175(1)(c). All of defendant’s assignment of errors, except one, were decided in a companion case. See State v. Cook, 163 Or App 578, 989 P2d 474 (1999). Defendant’s remaining assignment of error does not merit discussion.

Judgment of conviction vacated; remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for lesser-included offense of third-degree assault.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stuart, 989 P.2d 480, 164 Or. App. 169, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1948 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

989 P.2d 480 (State v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cook
989 P.2d 474 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)