State v. Stuart

16 N.W. 91, 61 Iowa 203
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 9, 1883·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Dat, Oh. J.

— It is not true that the indictment states a mere legal conclusion, and does not charge the facts. The indictment in substance alleges that the defendant falsely, feloniously and with intent to defraud, made a negotiable promissory note for $600, to which as maker the name of Wm. Larrabee was attached. A copy of the note thus made is set out in full. We do not see how the material facts could have been more fully stated. That the indictment is a good one, see 2 Bishop on Criminal Procedure, § 401; 2 Arch-bold’s Criminal Practice and Pleading, 799.

The court erred in sustaining the demurrer.

Beversed. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stuart, 16 N.W. 91, 61 Iowa 203 (iowa 1883).

16 N.W. 91 (State v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Weaver
128 N.W. 559 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1910)
State v. Hart
25 N.W. 99 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1885)