Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Stroud

State v. Stroud

550 S.E.2d 165, 353 N.C. 524, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 627
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 7, 2001·No. No. 165A95-3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

After carefully considering defendant’s pro se motion requesting that this Court void a previously filed petition for writ of certiorari, it appears to the Court that defendant is attempting to represent himself despite being currently represented by court-appointed counsel. Therefore, we dismiss the pro se filing.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of June, 2001.

s/ G.K. Butterfield. Jr.. J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stroud, 550 S.E.2d 165, 353 N.C. 524, 2001 N.C. LEXIS 627 (N.C. 2001).

550 S.E.2d 165 (State v. Stroud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.