State v. Strong

Wisconsin Supreme Court

State v. Strong

2000 WI 50, 611 N.W.2d 457, 235 Wis. 2d 379, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 394

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJune 16, 2000

Docket98-0248-CR

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2000 WI 50 (State v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Strong, 2000 WI 50, 611 N.W.2d 457, 235 Wis. 2d 379, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 394 (Wis. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed. Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS, and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. *380 BABLITCH, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would reverse. Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed. Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS, and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice WILLIAM A. *380 BABLITCH, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would reverse. Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 WI 50, 611 N.W.2d 457, 235 Wis. 2d 379, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-strong-wis-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack