State v. Strom
This text of 543 N.W.2d 372 (State v. Strom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, 1995 WTL 565062, answering a question certified by the district court be, and the same is, affirmed. The district court denied Strom’s motion to dismiss four counts of gross misdemeanor DWI on double jeopardy grounds but certified the double jeopardy question to the court of appeals as important and doubtful. The court of appeals answered the question in the negative. This case is controlled by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 N.W.2d 372, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 59, 1996 WL 50859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-strom-minn-1996.