State v. Strickland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Strickland

97 S.E.2d 450, 246 N.C. 120, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 367

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 17, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 S.E.2d 450 (State v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Strickland, 97 S.E.2d 450, 246 N.C. 120, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 367 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR Cttrtam.

Defendant’s plea of former jeopardy has no merit. The bill of indictment returned in July 1955 charged no criminal offense. He is now, for the first time, charged with the criminal offense of which he stands convicted. S. v. Strickland, 243 N.C. 100, 89 S.E. 2d 781. The motion to quash is without merit. S. v. Mincher, 178 N.C. 698, 100 S.E. 339. Defendant’s other assignments of error have been examined and have been found to be equally wanting in merit.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR Cttrtam.

Defendant’s plea of former jeopardy has no merit. The bill of indictment returned in July 1955 charged no criminal offense. He is now, for the first time, charged with the criminal offense of which he stands convicted. S. v. Strickland, 243 N.C. 100, 89 S.E. 2d 781. The motion to quash is without merit. S. v. Mincher, 178 N.C. 698, 100 S.E. 339. Defendant’s other assignments of error have been examined and have been found to be equally wanting in merit.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E.2d 450, 246 N.C. 120, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-strickland-nc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack