State v. Strickland

Supreme Court of Georgia

State v. Strickland

301 S.E.2d 891, 250 Ga. 827, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 651

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 6, 1983·No. 39566·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore [828]*828vacated.

Decided April 6, 1983. J. Brown Moseley, District Attorney, W. Paul Fryer, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. George C. Floyd, for appellee. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., Gregory and Weltner, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore [828]*828vacated.

Decided April 6, 1983. J. Brown Moseley, District Attorney, W. Paul Fryer, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. George C. Floyd, for appellee. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., Gregory and Weltner, JJ., who dissent.

State v. Strickland, 301 S.E.2d 891, 250 Ga. 827, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 651 (Ga. 1983).

Pincite

301 S.E.2d 891 (State v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related