State v. Straughn

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Straughn

850 N.E.2d 73, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1413

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 5, 2006

Docket2005-0585

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 850 N.E.2d 73 (State v. Straughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Straughn, 850 N.E.2d 73, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-040093. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The order affirming the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that modified the defendant’s sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-040093. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The order affirming the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that modified the defendant’s sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 N.E.2d 73, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-straughn-ohio-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack