State v. Straughn

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Straughn

850 N.E.2d 73, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1413

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 2006·No. 2005-0585·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-040093. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The order affirming the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that modified the defendant’s sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-040093. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The order affirming the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that modified the defendant’s sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

State v. Straughn, 850 N.E.2d 73, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

850 N.E.2d 73 (State v. Straughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related