State v. Stracener
This text of 49 So. 301 (State v. Stracener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the judge of probate discharging the petitioner from custody. The sheriff justified his detention of the prisoner under a mittimus issued by a justice of the peace on preliminary hearing. The only witness examined before the judge of probate was the petitioner. The whole evidence purports to be set out in the bill of exceptions. The petitioner testified that he was not present when certain explosions of dynamite took place, that he never gave any one such an explosive, that he had nothing to do with the explosions, and that he did not conspire to explode any dynamite. There is an entire absence of evidence or circumstance tending to show that the death of the party alleged to have been unlawfully slain was caused by these explosions as to which the petitioner testified to his want of connection in any form. Indeed, for aught that appears in the testimony, this defendant may have been guiltless of these explosions, and yet without legal excuse have otherwise killed the deceased. In short, the testimony on the habeas corpus hearing presents no relation between the acts with which the defendant denies his connection and the cause of the death of the deceased. We therefore hold that the prima facie case made by the mittimus was unshaken by any testimony submitted for the petitioner.
We need not consider the other questions argued. The order of discharge is, hence, reversed, and one will be here entered remanding the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff of Shelby county.
Reversed and rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 So. 301, 160 Ala. 123, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stracener-ala-1909.