State v. Stotesbery

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

State v. Stotesbery

360 N.W.2d 678, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 3767

CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 22, 1985

DocketNo. C9-83-1520

StatusPublished

This text of 360 N.W.2d 678 (State v. Stotesbery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stotesbery, 360 N.W.2d 678, 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 3767 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

[679]*679SUMMARY OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Following a jury trial on August 2, 1983, appellant was convicted of D.W.I. under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1982). On appeal he claims that the Commissioner of Public Safety failed to promulgate standards for the nurse who drew a blood sample from him. We affirm.

DECISION

Appellant’s contention was specifically addressed in Ouimby v. State, Department of Public Safety, 351 N.W.2d 629, 633 (Minn.1984), where the court held that “the training standards for those authorized to draw blood samples for later analysis for alcohol concentration promulgated by the Commissioner of Public Safety are sufficient to meet the statutory requirement.” His conviction, therefore, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI