State v. Storey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State v. Storey

351 S.E.2d 502, 181 Ga. App. 161, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2345

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 24, 1986

Docket73414

StatusPublished

This text of 351 S.E.2d 502 (State v. Storey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Storey, 351 S.E.2d 502, 181 Ga. App. 161, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2345 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Storey and several other persons were charged with disrupting the legislature by shouting protestations to the death penalty and refusing to obey orders of security personnel and other law enforcement [162]*162personnel to leave the State Capitol building, in violation of OCGA §§ 50-16-14 and 50-16-16. Appellees’ motion to dismiss the accusations on the ground that the statutes were unconstitutional was granted, and the State filed this appeal in the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Supreme Court ruled that it does not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the only issue in the case has been decided adversely to appellees’ contention of unconstitutionality. Therefore, the Supreme Court transferred the appeal to this court by order dated August 7, 1986.

Decided November 24, 1986 Rehearing denied December 5, 1986 James L. Webb, Solicitor, Norman R. Miller, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant Solicitors, for appellant. Michael R. Hauptman, for appellees.

Appellees’ motion to dismiss was based on three grounds. First, that the statutes are so overbroad and vague that they fail to place a reasonable person on notice as to what acts are made criminal, in violation of the due process clause; second, that the statutes violate First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and the right of all persons to assemble peaceably and petition the government for redress of grievances; and third, that the statutes, as applied to appellees, violate the aforementioned First Amendment rights.

We have no transcript of the hearing on the motion to dismiss. However, in appellees’ brief they acknowledge that they abandoned the first ground of their motion and that the trial court did not hear evidence on or otherwise consider the third ground of appellees’ motion to dismiss. In its order, the Supreme Court also stated that appellees abandoned the first ground of their motion to dismiss and that the trial court did not hear evidence on or otherwise consider the third ground of appellees’ motion to dismiss. Thus, the only issue before this court is whether §§ 50-16-14 and 50-16-16 violate First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and the right to assemble peaceably and petition the government for redress of their grievances. This issue has been decided adversely to appellees’ contention in State v. Boone, 243 Ga. 416, 418-419 (1) (254 SE2d 367) (1979). Accordingly, the trial court erred by granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the accusations against them.

Judgment reversed.

Banke, C. J., and Birdsong, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Judge.

Storey and several other persons were charged with disrupting the legislature by shouting protestations to the death penalty and refusing to obey orders of security personnel and other law enforcement [162]*162personnel to leave the State Capitol building, in violation of OCGA §§ 50-16-14 and 50-16-16. Appellees’ motion to dismiss the accusations on the ground that the statutes were unconstitutional was granted, and the State filed this appeal in the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Supreme Court ruled that it does not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the only issue in the case has been decided adversely to appellees’ contention of unconstitutionality. Therefore, the Supreme Court transferred the appeal to this court by order dated August 7, 1986.

Decided November 24, 1986 Rehearing denied December 5, 1986 James L. Webb, Solicitor, Norman R. Miller, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant Solicitors, for appellant. Michael R. Hauptman, for appellees.

Appellees’ motion to dismiss was based on three grounds. First, that the statutes are so overbroad and vague that they fail to place a reasonable person on notice as to what acts are made criminal, in violation of the due process clause; second, that the statutes violate First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and the right of all persons to assemble peaceably and petition the government for redress of grievances; and third, that the statutes, as applied to appellees, violate the aforementioned First Amendment rights.

We have no transcript of the hearing on the motion to dismiss. However, in appellees’ brief they acknowledge that they abandoned the first ground of their motion and that the trial court did not hear evidence on or otherwise consider the third ground of appellees’ motion to dismiss. In its order, the Supreme Court also stated that appellees abandoned the first ground of their motion to dismiss and that the trial court did not hear evidence on or otherwise consider the third ground of appellees’ motion to dismiss. Thus, the only issue before this court is whether §§ 50-16-14 and 50-16-16 violate First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and the right to assemble peaceably and petition the government for redress of their grievances. This issue has been decided adversely to appellees’ contention in State v. Boone, 243 Ga. 416, 418-419 (1) (254 SE2d 367) (1979). Accordingly, the trial court erred by granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the accusations against them.

Judgment reversed.

Banke, C. J., and Birdsong, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 S.E.2d 502, 181 Ga. App. 161, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-storey-gactapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack