State v. Storer
This text of 539 A.2d 631 (State v. Storer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The defendant, Henry Storer, appeals from his conviction of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp. 1987), and gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (Supp.1987), following a jury trial in the Superior Court, Piscata-quis County. On appeal, Storer challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending in particular that the victim’s testimony was internally inconsistent. We conclude, on the contrary, that on the basis of all the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the jury rationally could have found beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985); State v. Pelletier, 534 A.2d 970, 972 (Me.1987).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 A.2d 631, 1988 Me. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-storer-me-1988.