Home/Court of Appeals of South Carolina/State v. Stone

State v. Stone

24 S.C.L. 147
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 15, 1839
StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.C.L. 147 (State v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stone, 24 S.C.L. 147 (S.C. Ct. App. 1839).

Opinion

Curia, per ONeall, J.

In this case, we perceive no error in the legal instructions given to the jury. The facts well warranted the verdict.

The motion is dismissed.

Gantt, Evans and Butler, Justices, concurred. Richardson, [150]*150J. was absent 'from indisposition. Earle, J. was absent at the argument, but concurred in the judgment. M’Carthy, for the motion. Solicitor Edwards, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.C.L. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stone-scctapp-1839.