State v. Stone

279 P.3d 313, 250 Or. App. 142, 2012 WL 1744504, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 613
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 16, 2012·No. 211015898; A147351·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

After a trial on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. On appeal, defendant argues that the court erred by (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence and (2) conducting a bench trial without obtaining a written waiver of his right to a trial by jury. We reject without discussion defendant’s argument that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress. However, defendant’s remaining assignment of error is well taken. The state concedes that the record does not contain a valid waiver of jury trial and that defendant’s conviction must be reversed. We agree, accept the concession, and, for the reasons expressed in State v. Barber, 343 Or 525, 173 P3d 827 (2007), exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stone, 279 P.3d 313, 250 Or. App. 142, 2012 WL 1744504, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 613 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

279 P.3d 313 (State v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Barber
173 P.3d 827 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2007)