State v. Stone

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stone

576 S.W.3d 233

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 12, 2019

DocketWD 80162

StatusPublished

This text of 576 S.W.3d 233 (State v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stone, 576 S.W.3d 233 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Gordon Stone was convicted of statutory rape in the first degree. Stone appeals this conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding testimony that D.S., the victim, had a boyfriend, and in refusing to grant his motions for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State's evidence and at the close of all evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Gordon Stone was convicted of statutory rape in the first degree. Stone appeals this conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding testimony that D.S., the victim, had a boyfriend, and in refusing to grant his motions for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State's evidence and at the close of all evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 S.W.3d 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stone-moctapp-2019.