State v. Stone

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stone

576 S.W.3d 233

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2019·No. WD 80162·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Gordon Stone was convicted of statutory rape in the first degree. Stone appeals this conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding testimony that D.S., the victim, had a boyfriend, and in refusing to grant his motions for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State's evidence and at the close of all evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Gordon Stone was convicted of statutory rape in the first degree. Stone appeals this conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding testimony that D.S., the victim, had a boyfriend, and in refusing to grant his motions for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State's evidence and at the close of all evidence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stone, 576 S.W.3d 233 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

576 S.W.3d 233 (State v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.