State v. Stone

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 2013·No. SCWC-30059·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30059

10-JAN-2013

09:45 AM

SCWC-30059

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

CLARENCE STONE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30059; CASE NOS. 2DTA-08-00722;

2DTA-08-01628; 2DTC-08-011610; 2DTC-09-009261)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.

and Acoba, J., dissenting in part)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on November 30, 2012, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 10, 2013.

Hayden Aluli /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Peter A. Hanano for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

DISSENT IN PART BY ACOBA, J.

I respectfully dissent in part and would set this case for oral argument in view of the burgeoning and continuing question of the jurisdictional effect of defective charges.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stone, (haw 2013).

State v. Stone (State v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.