State v. Stone

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 2013
DocketSCWC-30059
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Stone (State v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stone, (haw 2013).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30059 10-JAN-2013 09:45 AM SCWC-30059

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CLARENCE STONE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30059; CASE NOS. 2DTA-08-00722; 2DTA-08-01628; 2DTC-08-011610; 2DTC-09-009261)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Acoba, J., dissenting in part)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ

of certiorari filed on November 30, 2012, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 10, 2013.

Hayden Aluli /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Peter A. Hanano for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack DISSENT IN PART BY ACOBA, J.

I respectfully dissent in part and would set this case

for oral argument in view of the burgeoning and continuing

question of the jurisdictional effect of defective charges.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Stone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stone-haw-2013.