State v. Stone
This text of State v. Stone (State v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30059 10-JAN-2013 09:45 AM SCWC-30059
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CLARENCE STONE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30059; CASE NOS. 2DTA-08-00722; 2DTA-08-01628; 2DTC-08-011610; 2DTC-09-009261)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Acoba, J., dissenting in part)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ
of certiorari filed on November 30, 2012, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 10, 2013.
Hayden Aluli /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Peter A. Hanano for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack DISSENT IN PART BY ACOBA, J.
I respectfully dissent in part and would set this case
for oral argument in view of the burgeoning and continuing
question of the jurisdictional effect of defective charges.
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Stone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stone-haw-2013.