State v. Stokes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Stokes

196 S.E.2d 288, 18 N.C. App. 148, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1804

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedMay 9, 1973

DocketNo. 732SC111

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 S.E.2d 288 (State v. Stokes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stokes, 196 S.E.2d 288, 18 N.C. App. 148, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1804 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

BROCK, Judge.

We have examined defendant’s assignments of error and find them to be without merit. An examination of the record reveals no prejudicial error. Defendant was charged in an indictment, which was proper in form; he was represented by competent counsel; he was found guilty by a jury after a fair trial and adequate instructions by the trial court; and the sentences imposed are within the statutory limits.

We hold that defendant had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI