State v. Stogdel

13 Ind. 565
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Ind. 565 (State v. Stogdel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stogdel, 13 Ind. 565 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Indictment against the defendant for seduction. The indictment was quashed on motion of the defendant, and the state excepted.

The indictment seems to be sufficiently formal, and states, in substance, that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., had illicit carnal intercourse with one Mary Deeter, a female of good repute for chastity, and under the age of twenty-one years, under a promise of marriage- made by the defendant to said Mary. The indictment is too long, [566]*566and contains too much verbiage and tautology, to justify its insertion in this opinion; But it contains, in substance, a charge of the crime of seduction, as defined in § 15, 2 R. S. p. 401.

D. Nation, for the state. C. D. Murray, for the appellee.

No objection has been pointed out to us, and we think there is none, which would authorize the quashing of the indictment.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hinkle v. State
61 N.E. 196 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ind. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stogdel-ind-1859.