State v. Stockman

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Stockman

80 P. 1134, 71 Kan. 852, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 255

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 8, 1905

DocketNo. 14,191

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 P. 1134 (State v. Stockman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stockman, 80 P. 1134, 71 Kan. 852, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 255 (kan 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Charles Stockman was convicted upon a charge of the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, and appeals. He complains because the trial court permitted a witness to testify that he believed that certain liquor was beer, after he had said that he did not know what it was; and because no evidence was given that Kirwin, in Phillips county, where the liquor was shown to have been sold, was in Kansas. Neither complaint is well founded, and neither requires discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Charles Stockman was convicted upon a charge of the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, and appeals. He complains because the trial court permitted a witness to testify that he believed that certain liquor was beer, after he had said that he did not know what it was; and because no evidence was given that Kirwin, in Phillips county, where the liquor was shown to have been sold, was in Kansas. Neither complaint is well founded, and neither requires discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 P. 1134, 71 Kan. 852, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stockman-kan-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack