State v. Stockamp

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stockamp

398 S.W.3d 490, 2013 WL 327115, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 115

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. ED 98311·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior drug offender and sentenced [491]*491him to seven years imprisonment, to be served concurrently with the other sentences he was then serving.

No error of law appears and no jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior drug offender and sentenced [491]*491him to seven years imprisonment, to be served concurrently with the other sentences he was then serving.

No error of law appears and no jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stockamp, 398 S.W.3d 490, 2013 WL 327115, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 490 (State v. Stockamp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related