State v. Stockamp

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stockamp

398 S.W.3d 490, 2013 WL 327115, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 115

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98311

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 398 S.W.3d 490 (State v. Stockamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stockamp, 398 S.W.3d 490, 2013 WL 327115, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior drug offender and sentenced [491]*491him to seven years imprisonment, to be served concurrently with the other sentences he was then serving.

No error of law appears and no jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI