State v. Stirton
This text of 139 P.3d 974 (State v. Stirton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted in Central Lane County Justice Court on 12 violations. He appealed to the Lane County Circuit Court and moved for a waiver of the filing fee. ORS 21.605(l)(a). The court denied defendant’s motion. Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court’s denial was an abuse of discretion because no evidence in the record contests any material in his affidavit of indigence and the court provided no explanation why it denied the motion. The state concedes that the court’s denial was an abuse of discretion. We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 P.3d 974, 207 Or. App. 54, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stirton-orctapp-2006.