State v. Stirton

139 P.3d 974, 207 Or. App. 54, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1031
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 19, 2006·No. A129412·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted in Central Lane County Justice Court on 12 violations. He appealed to the Lane County Circuit Court and moved for a waiver of the filing fee. ORS 21.605(l)(a). The court denied defendant’s motion. Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court’s denial was an abuse of discretion because no evidence in the record contests any material in his affidavit of indigence and the court provided no explanation why it denied the motion. The state concedes that the court’s denial was an abuse of discretion. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stirton, 139 P.3d 974, 207 Or. App. 54, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1031 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

139 P.3d 974 (State v. Stirton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 21.605
Oregon § 21.605