State v. Stimpson

563 A.2d 1001, 151 Vt. 645, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJune 15, 1989
DocketNo. 87-215
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 563 A.2d 1001 (State v. Stimpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stimpson, 563 A.2d 1001, 151 Vt. 645, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 113 (Vt. 1989).

Opinion

Defendant pled nolo contendere to several burglary offenses and as a condition of probation the trial court ordered that he pay restitution to the victims. A portion of the restitution award corresponded to an incident of burglary on March 10,1987, that was not covered by the plea agreement and for which defendant was not convicted. Defendant appeals from that portion of the restitution award.

“An order of restitution must relate to the damage caused by the criminal conduct for which the defendant was convicted.” State v. Knapp, 147 Vt. 56, 60, 509 A.2d 1010, 1012 (1986). That [646]*646link is absent with respect to the portion of the restitution award at issue. The record reveals that damages allocated to the March 10 burglary amounted to $550. The total losses from which the trial court calculated the restitution award should be reduced by'that amount, and a new order entered accordingly.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Toby Charbonneau
2016 VT 83 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2016)
State v. VanDusen
691 A.2d 1053 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 A.2d 1001, 151 Vt. 645, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stimpson-vt-1989.