State v. Stiltner

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Stiltner

2022 Ohio 3589, 203 N.E.3d 710, 169 Ohio St. 3d 277

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 12, 2022

Docket2021-0573

StatusPublished

This text of 2022 Ohio 3589 (State v. Stiltner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stiltner, 2022 Ohio 3589, 203 N.E.3d 710, 169 Ohio St. 3d 277 (Ohio 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-3589 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. STILTNER, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.] Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for a new trial consistent with State v. Brooks. (No. 2021-0573―Submitted October 4, 2022―Decided October 12, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Scioto County, No. 19CA3882, 2021-Ohio-959. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent with this court’s opinion in State v. Brooks, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-2478, __ N.E.3d __. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________ SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jay S. Willis, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Richard M. Nash Jr., for appellant, Nathan Stiltner. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-3589 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. STILTNER, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.] Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for a new trial consistent with State v. Brooks. (No. 2021-0573―Submitted October 4, 2022―Decided October 12, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Scioto County, No. 19CA3882, 2021-Ohio-959. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent with this court’s opinion in State v. Brooks, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-2478, __ N.E.3d __. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________ SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jay S. Willis, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Richard M. Nash Jr., for appellant, Nathan Stiltner. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2022 Ohio 3589, 203 N.E.3d 710, 169 Ohio St. 3d 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stiltner-ohio-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack