State v. Stiles

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Stiles

113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 550, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 152

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of this present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this unit of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

[551]*551For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNCellor, Swayzb, TreNCI-tard, BARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACII, WHITE, HePPENHEIMER, WilliaMs, Taylor, GaruNeu, AokbesoN, JJ. 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of this present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this unit of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

[551]*551For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNCellor, Swayzb, TreNCI-tard, BARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACII, WHITE, HePPENHEIMER, WilliaMs, Taylor, GaruNeu, AokbesoN, JJ. 13.

State v. Stiles, 113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 550, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 152 (N.J. 1921).

Pincite

113 A. 610 (State v. Stiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.