State v. Stiehl

164 P.3d 308, 214 Or. App. 197, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1002
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 18, 2007·No. 045665FE; A129420·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of supplying contraband, ORS 162.185(1).1 He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because there is no evidence in the record that he committed the “voluntarily act” necessary to support a conviction for introducing marijuana into the Jackson County Jail; rather, he was in possession of the marijuana when he was arrested by the police officer and transported to the jail against his will. The state concedes that, under State v. Tippetts, 180 Or App 350, 43 P3d 455 (2002), the trial court erred in denying the motion for a judgment of acquittal and that defendant’s conviction should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stiehl, 164 P.3d 308, 214 Or. App. 197, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1002 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

164 P.3d 308 (State v. Stiehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tippetts
43 P.3d 455 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)