State v. Stewart

868 P.2d 794, 126 Or. App. 456, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 250
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 23, 1994
Docket10-90-07017C; CA A71065
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 868 P.2d 794 (State v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stewart, 868 P.2d 794, 126 Or. App. 456, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 250 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

RIGGS, J.

The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant’s last assignment of error was not preserved. State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993). Accordingly, we modify the opinion to withdraw the paragraph in which we considered that assignment.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Travalini
168 P.3d 1159 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Mihm
972 P.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
State v. Casavan
912 P.2d 946 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Millican
906 P.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Merrill
899 P.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Montgomery
898 P.2d 766 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Taylor
892 P.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Stewart/Billings
892 P.2d 1013 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Wilkinson
889 P.2d 351 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
868 P.2d 794, 126 Or. App. 456, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stewart-orctapp-1994.