State v. Stewart
868 P.2d 794, 126 Or. App. 456, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 250
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 23, 1994·No. 10-90-07017C; CA A71065·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant’s last assignment of error was not preserved. State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993). Accordingly, we modify the opinion to withdraw the paragraph in which we considered that assignment.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Stewart, 868 P.2d 794, 126 Or. App. 456, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 250 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).
868 P.2d 794 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Travalini
168 P.3d 1159 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Mihm
972 P.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
State v. Casavan
912 P.2d 946 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Millican
906 P.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Merrill
899 P.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Montgomery
898 P.2d 766 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Taylor
892 P.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
State v. Stewart/Billings
892 P.2d 1013 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Wilkinson
889 P.2d 351 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)