State v. Stewart

986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 2013
Docket2013-0121
StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 26 (State v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stewart, 986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 11AP-787, 2012-Ohio-4500. On motion to consolidate with case No. 2012-1941, State v. Stewart, Franklin App. No. 11AP-787, 2012-Ohio-4500. Motion granted. Discretionary appeal accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded for application of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341, and State v. Brwnning, 134 Ohio St.3d 438, 2012-Ohio-5752, 983 N.E.2d 316.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2012-0415 and 2012-0416, State v. Forrest, Franklin App. No. 11AP-291, 2012-Ohio-280.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brunning
2012 Ohio 5752 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
State v. Howard
2012 Ohio 5738 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stewart-ohio-2013.