State v. Stewart

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Stewart

986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1408

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2013·No. 2012-1941·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 11AP-787, 2012-Ohio-4500. On motion to consolidate with case No. 2013-0121, State v. Stewart, Franklin App. No. 11AP-787, 2012-Ohio-4500. Motion granted. Discretionary appeal accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded for application of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341, and State v. Brunning, 134 Ohio St.3d 438, 2012-Ohio-5752, 983 N.E.2d 316.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 11AP-787, 2012-Ohio-4500. On motion to consolidate with case No. 2013-0121, State v. Stewart, Franklin App. No. 11AP-787, 2012-Ohio-4500. Motion granted. Discretionary appeal accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded for application of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341, and State v. Brunning, 134 Ohio St.3d 438, 2012-Ohio-5752, 983 N.E.2d 316.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

State v. Stewart, 986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

986 N.E.2d 26 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related