State v. Stewart

Nevada Supreme Court

State v. Stewart

6 Nev. 175

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1870·Published

Opinion

By the Court,

WHITMAN, J.:

In this case, wherein the appellant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, there was no evidence proving, or tending to prove his guilt, as principal or accessory before the fact; hence he was illegally convicted.

The motion made for a new trial should have been granted, and was erroneously refused. That order and the judgment are reversed and the cause remanded. ' • ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

WHITMAN, J.:

In this case, wherein the appellant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, there was no evidence proving, or tending to prove his guilt, as principal or accessory before the fact; hence he was illegally convicted.

The motion made for a new trial should have been granted, and was erroneously refused. That order and the judgment are reversed and the cause remanded. ' • ■

State v. Stewart, 6 Nev. 175 (Neb. 1870).

Pincite

6 Nev. 175 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.