State v. Stewart

453 So. 2d 1251, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9062
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 27, 1984·No. No. CR83-650·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FORET, Judge.

Defendant, Samuel Stewart, was charged by bill of information with possession of marijuana, with intent to distribute, in violation of LSA-R.S. 40:966 A(l).

[1252]*1252After trial before a jury of twelve, defendant was found guilty as charged. The defendant was sentenced to serve ten years at hard labor and pay a fine of $15,000.00, plus court costs.

Although defendant has filed a brief containing two allegations of error, he failed to file any assignments of error with the trial court. Allegations of error not embodied in a formal assignment of error and appearing for the first time in a defendant’s brief are not properly before a reviewing court. State v. Spears, 350 So.2d 603 (La.1977); LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 844. Therefore, this case is reviewable only for errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings, and without inspection of the evidence. LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920; State v. Jackson, 332 So.2d 211 (La.1976). We have fully reviewed the record for these errors and find none.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stewart, 453 So. 2d 1251, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 9062 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 1251 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Terrase
468 So. 2d 729 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
State v. Stewart
456 So. 2d 1011 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984)