State v. Stewart

648 So. 2d 382, 1994 WL 708515
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. LEXIS 2053
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 16, 1994·No. No. 94-K-1950·Published

Opinion

In re Stewart, Kevin James; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of prohibition, writ of mandamus,; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA93 1631; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 235,274.

[383]*383Granted in part; denied in part. The defendant’s sentences are amended to run concurrently, not consecutively, and as amended are affirmed. Cf., State v. Cann, 471 So.2d 701 (La.1985). In all other respects, the application is denied.

HALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stewart, 648 So. 2d 382, 1994 WL 708515 (La. 1994).

648 So. 2d 382 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cann
471 So. 2d 701 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)