State v. Stewart
648 So. 2d 382, 1994 La. LEXIS 3016, 1994 WL 708514
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. LEXIS 2053 →
Opinion
In re Stewart, Kevin James; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of prohibition, writ of mandamus,; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 235,274; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA93 1630.
Granted in part; denied in part. The defendant’s sentences are amended to run concurrently, not consecutively, and as amended are affirmed. Cf., State v. Cann, 471 So.2d 701 (La.1985). In all other respects, the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Stewart, 648 So. 2d 382, 1994 La. LEXIS 3016, 1994 WL 708514 (La. 1994).
648 So. 2d 382 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Cann
471 So. 2d 701 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)