State v. Stewart

763 A.2d 1039, 255 Conn. 913, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 447
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 5, 2000·No. SC 16436·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 301 (AC 18813), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the facts of this case, the trial court’s failure to give a ‘no unfavorable inference’ instruction was plain error requiring reversal of the conviction?

“2. Is the failure to include such an instruction subject to harmless error analysis?”

It is further ordered that the trial court articulate the facts concerning discussions, if any, among the state’s attorney, defense counsel and the court during a charging conference, relative to the court’s giving a “no unfavorable inference” instruction to the jury in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stewart, 763 A.2d 1039, 255 Conn. 913, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 447 (Colo. 2000).

763 A.2d 1039 (State v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Roman
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2026
State v. Ruocco
144 A.3d 354 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2016)
State v. Walker
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2015
State v. Ruocco
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014
State v. Hicks
903 A.2d 685 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
People v. McAfee
104 P.3d 226 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2004)
Allen v. State
2002 WY 48 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2002)
State v. Stewart
780 A.2d 209 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)