State v. Stevenson

286 N.W.2d 719, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1746
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 23, 1979
Docket49200
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 286 N.W.2d 719 (State v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stevenson, 286 N.W.2d 719, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1746 (Mich. 1979).

Opinion

PETERSON, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of having committed two sepa *720 rate acts of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree against a 15-year-old girl whom he and his wife had taken to an abandoned farmhouse, which they claimed they were leasing. The trial court sentenced defendant to two consecutive maximum terms of 5 years each. Defendant, on this appeal, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the propriety of multiple punishment. We affirm.

Defendant’s contention that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient is meritless.

A closer issue, but one which we also resolve against defendant, is that raised by the contention that in sentencing him to two terms the trial court violated § 609.035, which bars multiple punishment of a defendant for multiple offenses arising from the same behavioral incident. While the offenses both involved coerced sexual intercourse with the same 15-year-old girl and both occurred in the same general place and on the same day, the offenses were separated by a period of approximately 5 hours and neither act bore any essential relationship to the other. Further, the underlying purpose of § 609.035 is to prevent punishment which is disproportionate to the culpability of the defendant. Here, we are satisfied that multiple punishment of defendant is not barred by the statute and is consistent with the purpose of the statute. See, State v. Shevchuk, 282 Minn. 182, 163 N.W.2d 772 (1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Minnesota v. Mainza Lombe Malambo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Benjamin Klanderud
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sedne Bonitaz Williams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2016
State of Minnesota v. Wilfred Carl Hudson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2015
State v. Suhon
742 N.W.2d 16 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2007)
State v. Johnson
653 N.W.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2002)
State v. Jackson
615 N.W.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2000)
State v. Bookwalter
541 N.W.2d 290 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1995)
State v. Naylor
474 N.W.2d 314 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1991)
State v. Secrest
437 N.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1989)
State v. Axford
419 N.W.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1988)
Langdon v. State
375 N.W.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)
Bixby v. State
344 N.W.2d 390 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1984)
State v. Herberg
324 N.W.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
Stevenson v. Young
314 N.W.2d 821 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
State v. Scott
304 N.W.2d 296 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 N.W.2d 719, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stevenson-minn-1979.