State v. Stevenson
This text of 209 N.W.2d 915 (State v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from his conviction of manslaughter in the second degree. The trial court denied defendant’s pretrial motion to bar cross-examination of defendant as to prior convictions. The defendant testified and admitted prior convictions of aggravated assault and simple assault 3 years previously and of assault and battery 7 years previously. We affirm.
As stated in State v. Stewart, 297 Minn. 57, 209 N. W. 2d 913 (1973), we are not disposed to overrule State v. West, 285 Minn. 188, 173 N. W. 2d 468 (1969), as to use of prior convictions as impeachment of a defendant in a criminal proceeding.
The compelling interests of justice in the Stewart case are not present in this case so as to preclude the use of these prior convictions for purposes of impeachment.
We have considered defendant’s other claims on appeal and find no reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 N.W.2d 915, 297 Minn. 60, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stevenson-minn-1973.