State v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Stevens

DecidedNovember 13, 2007

Docket2007-UP-527

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Stevens (State v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stevens, (S.C. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Neal Stevens, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-527
Submitted November 1, 2007 Filed November 13, 2007

AFFIRMED

Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot, Assistant Attorney General Julie M. Thames, all of Columbia, and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Neal Stevens appeals his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Stevens asserts the trial judge erred in denying his motion for directed verdict on the basis that a reasonable jury could not have found him guilty of the single first-degree criminal sexual conduct charge, because the jury acquitted him on nearly identical charges, based on the similar evidence, involving the same victim. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Edwards, 298 S.C. 272, 275, 379 S.E.2d 888, 889 (1989) (finding that on a motion for a directed verdict in a criminal case, the trial court is concerned with the existence or non-existence of evidence, not its weight); State v. McGowan, 347 S.C. 618, 622, 557 S.E.2d 657, 659 (2001) (holding if the State presents any direct evidence or any substantial circumstantial evidence which reasonably tends to prove the guilt of the accused, an appellate court must find the case was properly submitted to the jury).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., and KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Neal Stevens, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-527
Submitted November 1, 2007 Filed November 13, 2007

AFFIRMED

Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot, Assistant Attorney General Julie M. Thames, all of Columbia, and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Neal Stevens appeals his conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Stevens asserts the trial judge erred in denying his motion for directed verdict on the basis that a reasonable jury could not have found him guilty of the single first-degree criminal sexual conduct charge, because the jury acquitted him on nearly identical charges, based on the similar evidence, involving the same victim. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Edwards, 298 S.C. 272, 275, 379 S.E.2d 888, 889 (1989) (finding that on a motion for a directed verdict in a criminal case, the trial court is concerned with the existence or non-existence of evidence, not its weight); State v. McGowan, 347 S.C. 618, 622, 557 S.E.2d 657, 659 (2001) (holding if the State presents any direct evidence or any substantial circumstantial evidence which reasonably tends to prove the guilt of the accused, an appellate court must find the case was properly submitted to the jury).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., and KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Stevens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stevens-scctapp-2007.

Opinion

AFFIRMED.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack